|
|
|||
|
CrossFit Asheville WODS • November 6, 2009, at 9:33 pm
A Higher PowerToday at CrossFit Asheville we did Turkish Get Ups for strength and a hardcore weightlifting WOD called “Overhead Power” (last performed on September 26th), involving a total of 90 reps of six different weightlifting moves (Hang Power Snatch, Overhead Squats, Hang Power Cleans, Push Presses, Hang Squat Cleans, and Push Jerks). Training Cycle: Week 5/6 (Work Week)
Dietary Cycle: Week 2/3 (Building) Daily Calorie Target: 3100 (Zone “blocks:” approx 21 pro/cho [147 g / 189 g], 63 fat [189 g]) Third WOD of this Week Warm-UpA medley of jumping rope, including work on crossovers and double-unders, with agility ladders, cones and crawling, followed by stretching, then push-ups (20), sit-ups (20), overhead squats (20), and pull-ups (13 total; all dead hang; actually I did three after the WOD so they weren’t warm ups, were they?). Strength: Turkish Get UpI didn’t do much volume. Results: 3 x 35 lbs each arm, with kettlebells. Then, using a lightweight olympic bar: 3 x 15 kg (33.06 lbs) bar; then 2 x 20 kg with the bar. The bar was a nice challenge. WOD: Overhead PowerLast performed on Sep 26th.
I went up in weight from last time, substantially, mainly due to my recent gains in the departments of the overhead squat and the hang power snatch. Results: Round 1, 65 lbs, end at 2:29 (2:29); Round 2, 85 lbs, start at 3:29, end at 5:40 (3:11); Round 3, 105 lbs, start at 7:40, end at 13:34 (5:54); official time: 10:34. Comparison with last time: (a) Volume skyrocketed: 5,850 vs. 7,650 (30% increase), a substantial improvement; (b) Time also increased, by 2:35 (33% worse), substantially less fast; (c) Power analysis: 733 pounds/min vs. 724 pounds/min, slightly worse (1.2% decrease in power). Analysis: I had a 1.2% decrease in power, but a 30% increase in overall volume. I would have to say that, training wise, I accomplished more today than I did 5 weeks ago. I know that I pushed myself harder in terms of the technical skill required to move the weights, and the amount of effort required to move the weight through each individual rep (i.e. volume also represents the average weight per rep, which was also up 30%). But the comparative slowness is an issue of mental toughness that I would like to address. If I had only gone a little bit faster, I could have seen an improvement in power. I’ll rock it next time. 3 comments to A Higher Power |
|||
|
Copyright © 2012 Training Board - All Rights Reserved |
|||
Equal power output (or even a 1.2% decrease) at heavier weights is not standing still, it’s a huge improvement (I don’t know why you’re saying the “comparative slowness”). You’re definitely in the region where your maximal power output is decreasing with load (see, for example, “Fooling Around with Fran,” CFJ March ’05), so the same power at heavier loads suggests an upward shift in your power curve. An increase in load at the same power output is just as much an improvement as an increse in power at a fixed load.
Robert I think I probably could kiss you right now. When it comes to math, you’re the expert. LOL. I get it! I think you’re right.
What I meant by “comparative slowness” was only the total time for the 90 reps w/ rests — almost 3 minutes longer this time. There were moments where I wasn’t moving the bar (because of fear, or feeling intimidated by the heavy weight, or just feeling spent) and next time, I do think I can decrease the number of moments where that happened, increasing my speed and power. How have you been lately buddy?
By the way, the article Robert referred to (Glassman, “Fooling Around With Fran,” CrossFit Journal March 1st, 2005) can be read online (by CrossFit Journal subscribers) at http://journal.crossfit.com/2005/03/fooling-around-with-fran-by-gr.tpl